“A knowledge synthesis attempts to summarize all pertinent studies on a specific question, can improve the understanding of inconsistencies in diverse evidence, and can identify gaps in research evidence to define future research agendas.” from Kastner, M. et al. What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review. BMC Med. Res. Methodol.12, 114 (2012).
The research methodology of knowledge synthesis varies across disciplines and comprises several types of reviews (quantitative or qualitative) including, but not limited to narrative, systematic, scoping, integrative, rapid, and realist. This type of research demands considerable resources and time, typically spanning from two to over twelve months for completion, depending on the topic and type of review.
Whether you're in the health sciences, social sciences, or any other discipline, we can assist with knowledge synthesis work, including systematic and scoping reviews. This includes identifying relevant databases, selecting appropriate keywords, and advise on strategies/tools to help with the review process. Our goal is to save you time and ensure you have access to the most relevant, high-quality sources for your research.
To learn about the different ways librarians can support your knowledge synthesis project, please visit Support for Knowledge Syntheses.
Please visit our Knowledge Syntheses Research Guide to learn about different types of syntheses, processes, timelines and tools.